Majestic vs. Moz For Linkbuilding – Which Is Better?
In a nutshell:
- Typically, Majestic indexes far more many backlinks than Moz
- Majestic tends to be a little less forgiving than Moz when it comes to rating the “spamminess” of those links, allowing you to better spot toxic links
- Majestic includes topic categories, which is vital to backlinks building, while Moz does not. If you have a basketball blog, backlinks from a home improvement website are not going to be particularly helpful.
1. Majestic indexes far more many backlinks than Moz
Pretty much across the board, Majestic finds a lot more of a site’s backlinks than Moz. Here is an example of the backlink profile of a prominent law firm in Philadelphia:
You’ll see that it has indexed around 40k backlinks. Now let’s see how many Moz Open Site Explorer found for the same site:
Moz found a fraction of the links pointing to this site (1,150).
CAN YOU RELY ON MOZ OPEN SITE EXPLORER FOR BACKLINK BUILDING?
This leads to a big question: can you rely on Moz to determine the quality of the backlink profile of a website if it only finds 1 in every 10 links going to it? My opinion is that you cannot.
- Will it tell you with any accuracy if a site has a huge spam backlink profile? Maybe, maybe not.
- Will it help you to find backlink sources? Not if it misses 9 out of 10 of them.
- Can you use it to guess where a site should be ranking? Again, I can’t see how you can if it misses such a large number of backlinks.
2. Majestic is a lot less forgiving when it comes to spam
One of our client’s competitors has a backlink profile that is almost entire spam comments. The site has roughtly 2 million links like this one, which we found on a blog about Mercedes Benz:
This site should set off every alarm when its URL is placed into an SEO tool. Let’s see what we see with Majestic:
It has a very low trust flow, and a 1 to 6 TF to CF ratio, which indicates a spammy backlink profile. What does Moz find for the same site? (click here to learn about Majestic TF and CF)
According to Moz, this is a fairly authoritative website, with a DA of 39 and a PA of 48. The “spam score” is only a 2 of 17, despite the 2,000,000+ spam blog comments pointing to the site. In this case, Moz really falls short.
3. Majestic includes topic categories and Moz does not
If you are building links, you want to get links from sites that are about the same topic as your website. Majestic provides a “topical trust flow” metric, which lets you know what kind of websites are linking to a specific domain or URL. This can help you to:
- determine whether you want to reach out to a blog or not
- tell if the blog seems to be spamming (if it has dozens and dozens of links from sites with unrelated topics, there’s a chance that the owner is spamming)
This can be vital when trying to keep a clean backlink profile.
Ultimately, Majestic provides more of the information that you need to perform backlink research, but it is still just one tool available.
As I’ve written in past posts, these tools are all like the blind men feeling the elephant. Moz Open Site Explorer, Ahrefs, Majestic, Spyfu, SEM Rush, and all of the other tools are measuring just a part of what is going on with a site. None of these tools have the click data that SEOs hypothesize play a significant role in how RankBrain works, none of them factor the historical data of the website, and none are measuring things like page speed or user experience. These tools are valuable when looking for opportunities to build links, to create content, or to try to break down a competitor’s online strategy. They all fall short when it comes to the bottom line goal: why is a specific site ranking as well as it is?